| The Truth About Maryland's Deer Population |
|
The truth about Maryland's deer population can be read in HB9, the Deer Management Bill that was introduced by the MSA, and passed both the Maryland House and Senate in the 2002 Legislative session. The preamble of this bill describes the current state of Maryland's deer population, and the problems it is causing.
“The current population of deer in the State of Maryland, which is estimated at
more than 250,000, is far beyond what the available habitat can accommodate
Despite the disruption of rural habitat areas because of development projects and
recreational uses, deer are remarkably adaptable to residential areas, including urban
and suburban sprawl areas, where they enjoy safety from natural predators and hunters
As demonstrated by a 1998-1999 survey of Anne Arundel, Howard, Montgomery,
and Prince George's counties in which the number of deer in the areas studied increased
by approximately 50% in the course of only 1 year, this population is not only thriving but
reproducing at a startling rate
When a deer herd reaches its upper density limits, as is now the case, the results
are the poor health and weakened physical condition of the animals themselves, as well as their
overconsumption of native plants, shrubs, and trees that are necessary for the survival of other
species in the natural ecosystem
In tandem with this multiplication of the deer population have been alarming
spikes in the rate of tick-borne illnesses transmitted to human beings, such
as Lyme disease
The rate of reported deer-vehicle collisions has more than doubled in the State
since 1990, and these collisions have caused multiple fatalities and serious injuries
Deer-vehicle collisions likewise cause property damage of about $10 million per
year, which, in turn, leads to higher insurance rates for all drivers
A recent University of Maryland study found that, because of deer, 92% of the
State's farmers suffer damage to corn, wheat, and soybean crops, an annual
economic loss in excess of $38 million which is considered a conservative estimate because
it does not include damage to fruits, vegetables, and other crops;
Non-lethal control mechanisms, such as fencing, fertility control, repellents,
relocation, deterrent reflectors along roadways, and behavior modification
by the installation of lights, have proven largely ineffective because they cannot
be used routinely and inexpensively and moreover, they impact only a small number of deer
Extended research has shown that hunting is the most effective method to reduce
the size of the deer herd, and it is likewise the most cost-effective method to do
so
Since the annual revenue associated with deer hunting in Maryland is approximately $80 million,
hunters provide a significant boost to local economies, and their license fees also cover all
associated program cost
The increased harvest of deer by hunting is thus necessary for the public interest and to stabilize
the deer population and manage it more appropriately “
Sources
used:
http://mlis.state.md.us/2002rs/bills/hb/hb0009t.rtf